Ethical and Philosophical Analysis of Conditional Death Sentence Implementation under Article 100 of Law Number 1 of 2023

Authors

  • Wawan Suprawan Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Yuyut Prayuti Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.6.3.2026.1155

Keywords:

Conditional Death Penalty, Criminal Code, Human Rights, Legal Philosophy

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 introduces a conditional death penalty system that allows the suspension of executions for a ten-year probationary period, with the possibility of conversion into life imprisonment based on rehabilitation. This research analyzes the ethical legitimacy and philosophical foundations of this “middle-way” approach, specifically evaluating its alignment with human rights principles and the ultimate objectives of punishment. Using a normative-juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study examined Law Number 1 of 2023 and relevant human rights instruments. The findings indicated that while the conditional death penalty is presented as a humanization of criminal law, it creates profound ethical tensions. The ten-year waiting period induces extreme psychological suffering, often termed the “death row phenomenon”, which may constitute inhuman treatment. Philosophically, Article 100 reveals a conflict between retributive justice and rehabilitative goals. Furthermore, the state’s role as an arbiter of life remains contested under international human rights standards. The study concludes that this provision serves as a pragmatic political compromise but requires rigorous safeguards to prevent administrative arbitrariness and ensure substantive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrarini, L. S. P. (2025). Dinamika pidana mati dalam KUHP baru: Pembaruan hukum pidana dan tantangan implementasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 13(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i2.7359.

Agustia, R., Rosikhu, M., Rahmatyar, & Ana. (2025). Analisis yuridis pidana mati bersyarat dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(1), 45–60.

Ananda, L. (2023). Analisis perspektif hukum dan etika kasus pembunuhan berencana dan pertimbangan pengenaan hukuman mati. Action Research Literate, 7(9), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.46799/arl.v7i9.150.

Arafat, M. (2025). Paradigma pemidanaan baru dalam KUHP 2023: Alternatif sanksi dan transformasi sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. JIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v2i1.1047.

Ardiansyah, D., Adiaat, M., Aditya, Cahyani, I., & Rahmawati, N. (2024). Tinjauan filosofis pemidanaan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Rampai Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v4i2.348.

Bato, K. (2023). Manusia Dibakar! HAM dan keadilan harus ditegakkan (Perspektif HAM menurut John Locke). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 2(1), 15–29.

Duff, R. A. (2022). Punishment as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elvariani, R., & Tongat. (2025). Rekonstruksi pidana mati dalam KUHP 2023: Kajian normatif. Al-Zayan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Ilmu Hukum, 3(5), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i5.2504.

Falevi, Y., Zain, M. A., Bhaswara, N. G., Rafli, M., & Putra, A. S. (2023). Implikasi penjatuhan hukuman mati terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i3.1847.

Fiddin, M. F., & Karli. (2023). Analisis asas legalitas dalam kewenangan presiden menunda eksekusi. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(4), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v2i4.2116.

Hamzah, A. (1993). Sistem pidana dan pemidanaan di Indonesia. Bandung: PT Pradnya Paramita.

Harahap, H. R., & Fikri, A. M. (2025). Criminal policy reform for medical personnel in Indonesia’s new criminal code: Legal protection and implementation challenges. Research Horizon, 5(6), 2923–2934. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.6.2025.910.

Hirsch, A. von. (2022). Proportionate sentencing: Exploring the principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2023). The death penalty: A worldwide perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Husairi, A., Putra, D. A., Putri, N. E., Izzati, S. N., & Saputri, K. (2024). Problematika hukuman mati di Indonesia dalam perspektif hukum pidana dan hak asasi manusia. In Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia (pp. 16–29). Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Karmila, K., Arinda, S., Putri, E., & Hutapea, S. A. (2025). Kontroversi hukuman mati dalam sistem peradilan pidana dilihat dari perspektif HAM (Hak Asasi Manusia) dan kriminologi. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.3851.

Manoppo, G. A., Pongoh, J. K., & Bawole, G. Y. (2023). Analisis pidana mati berdasarkan Pasal 100 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Administratum, 13(1), 55–70.

McNeill, F. (2022). Pervasive punishment: Making sense of mass supervision. Bristol: Bristol University Press.

Muntafa, P., & Mahmud, A. (2023). Penerapan hukum pidana mati bersyarat dalam KUHP baru dihubungkan dengan asas kepastian hukum. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 4(2), 130–136.

Nasution, M. I., Ali, M., Lubis, & Fauziah. (2024). Pembaruan sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia: Kajian literatur atas KUHP baru. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 77–92.

Nur, S. H. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum. Malang: Qiara Media.

Pane, M. D. (2021). Pidana mati di Indonesia: Teori, regulasi dan aplikasi. Malang: Refika Aditama.

Pasalima, P., Riyanto, E. A., & Jebaru, A. M. (2024). Refleksi etis filosofis mengenai vonis hukuman mati bersyarat di Indonesia pada Pasal 100 UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Datin Law Jurnal, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.36355/dlj.v5i1.1314.

Pujiati. (2024). Metode penelitian yuridis normatif di bidang hukum. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Saputra, M. J., Yusi, S., & Murdani, B. (2024). Orientasi terhadap Pasal 100 tentang pidana mati pada Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Nova Juris: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 13–24.

Simanjutak, G. D. T. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap perubahan pelaksanaan pidana mati akibat terpenuhinya syarat berkelakuan baik dalam UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. E-Journal Fatwa Hukum Faculty of Law Universitas Tanjungpura, 8(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.818.

Simanjutak, R. (2023). Pidana mati bersyarat dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia: Studi kasus UU Narkotika. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v6i2.8464.

Syaifullah. (2024). Transformation of the sentencing paradigm in Indonesia: A juridical study of the implementation of restorative justice in the new criminal code. Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 9(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v9i1.14.

Syauket, A. (2023). Kepastian hukum masa tunggu eksekusi pidana mati bagi bandar narkoba. Malang: PT Literasi Abadi Nusantara Grup.

Tofik, C. Y. (2022). Hukum pidana. Malang: PT Sangir Multi Usaha.

Widjaja, G., & Nurhidayanti, R. (2024). Analysis of the abolition of the death penalty for drug trafficking crimes in Indonesia: The case study Serang District Court Decision Number 837/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Srg. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), 9(5), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2024.905044.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Suprawan, W., & Prayuti, Y. (2026). Ethical and Philosophical Analysis of Conditional Death Sentence Implementation under Article 100 of Law Number 1 of 2023. Research Horizon, 6(3), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.6.3.2026.1155

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.