Organizational Ambidexterity for Indonesian Economic Development Research: Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.4.6.2024.431Keywords:
Ambidexterity, Organizational Ambidexterity, Bibliometric, IndonesiaAbstract
The study of organizational ambidexterity has been the focus of research attention in recent years. Yet, it is important to understand the evolution of research in this field and related trends. This research is expected to identify the gap between developments and trends in the world and developments and trends in Indonesia. In this study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using 645 articles retrieved from the Scopus database. The results show that researches on organizational ambidexterity are on the rise. United State of America is the country with the most published articles with a percentage of 21% of total top 10 countries publications, while Indonesia has only 14 articles indexed by Scopus in this field. The most productive source or journal in the last five years is Sustainability (Switzerland). Researchers in this area have expanded their focus to new and different topics related to organizational ambidexterity, including sustainability, digital transformation, and entrepreneurial orientation. The findings of this paper can help academics and practitioners to better understand the research development trends in the field of organizational ambidexterity, as well as provide a comprehensive view for future research, especially in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Adhiatma, A., Fachrunnisa, O., Lukman, N., & Majid, M. N. A. (2023). Comparative study on workforce transformation strategy and SME policies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(4), 1-11.
Ali, A. (2021). Determining mediating role of managerial commitment and technological capability between environmental management accounting and organisational efficiency: a case of middle eastern countries. Arthatama, 5(2), 27-38.
Al-Khawaldah, R., Al-Zoubi, W., Alshaer, S., Almarshad, M., ALShalabi, F., Altahrawi, M., & Al-Hawary, S. (2022). Green supply chain management and competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 961-972.
Andrade, J., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2021). Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs. Review of Managerial Science, 15(7), 2111-2136.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization science, 20(4), 696-717.
Arief, M., & Paryono, H. Y. (2015). Social technology adoption and organizational ambidexterity in Indonesia. Advanced Science Letters, 21(4), 1000-1004.
Ayaz, G., & Zahid, M. (2024). Trends, shifts and future prospects of sustainable finance research: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(5), 1094-1117.
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mani, V. (2022). Analyzing the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and digital business transformation on industry 4.0 capabilities and sustainable supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 27(6), 696-711.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.
Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization science, 20(4), 781-796.
Çelik, D., & Uzunçarşılı, Ü. (2023). Is the Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity and Technological Innovation Capability on Firm Performance Mediated by Competitive Advantage? An Empirical Research on Turkish Manufacturing and Service Industries. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231206367.
Chakma, R., Paul, J., & Dhir, S. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 121-137.
Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213.
Du, J., & Chen, Z. (2018). Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 42-52.
Ed-Dafali, S., Al-Azad, M. S., Mohiuddin, M., & Reza, M. N. H. (2023). Strategic orientations, organizational ambidexterity, and sustainable competitive advantage: Mediating role of industry 4.0 readiness in emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 401, 136765.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, 49(4), 693-706.
Hael, M., Belhaj, F. A., & Zhang, H. (2024). Organizational learning and innovation: A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Heliyon.
Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review, 28(4), 431-448.
Kafetzopoulos, P., Psomas, E., & Katou, A. A. (2023). Promoting strategic flexibility and business performance through organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, 15(17), 12997.
Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research policy, 47(2), 413-427.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of management, 32(5), 646-672.
Lukito-Budi, A. S., Manik, H. F. G. G., & Indarti, N. (2023). Reorienting the organisational strategy of SMEs during the COVID-19 crisis: can entrepreneurial orientation help?. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(1), 28-40.
Maguni, W., Rum, J., & Hadi, M. (2023). Investigation of the Effect of Organizational Ambidexterity and Innovation Capability on Supply Chain Performance: An Empirical Study of Indonesian MSMEs. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(7), e1050-e1050.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mardi, M., Arief, M., Furinto, A., & Kumaradjaja, R. (2018). Sustaining organizational performance through organizational ambidexterity by adapting social technology. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 1049-1066.
Nobakht, M., Hejazi, S. R., Akbari, M., & Sakhdari, K. (2021). Exploring the relationship between open innovation and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Innovation, 23(1), 71-92.
Nofiani, D., Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A. S., & Manik, H. F. G. G. (2021). The dynamics between balanced and combined ambidextrous strategies: a paradoxical affair about the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on SMEs’ performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1262-1286.
Nofriady, H., Ellanto, K., Pradwipa, A., Indriani, F., & Muharam, H. (2024). The Impact of the Business Cluster Program on Micro Business Growth Through a Green Economy Approach. Research Horizon, 4(4), 73-80.
Ologbenla, P. (2021). The effect of corporate tax on government expenditure in Nigeria. Research Horizon, 1(5), 157-171.
Prasetio, A. B., Aboobaider, B. B. M., & Ahmad, A. B. (2022). Organizational Ambidexterity as an Outcome of Quality Dimensions and Triple Helix: The Role of Technology Readiness and User Satisfaction. Sustainability, 14(21), 14237.
Putranti, H. R. D., Suparmi, S., & Susilo, A. (2020). Work life balance (WLB) complexity and performance of employees during Covid-19 pandemic. Arthatama, 4(1), 56-68.
Rahardjo, A. A., Lim, W. L., & Tan, G. W. H. (2024). How does entrepreneurial orientation influence organisational ambidexterity? Moderating effect of organisational unlearning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 36(3), 363-387.
Rahman, Y., Syarifudin, F., Mardiyah, M., & Sukresna, I. M. (2024). Potential For Financing New Renewable Energy Solar Energy in Supporting Green Banking. Research Horizon, 4(4), 81-88.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, 34(3), 375-409.
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization science, 20(4), 685-695.
Rao, I., & Thakur, P. (2019). Knowledge workers, organisational ambidexterity and sustainability: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(3), 415-428.
Rauf, A., Tope, P., & Djirimu, M. A. (2022). Impact Analysis of the Poverty Alleviation Acceleration Program in Paleleh District, Buol Regency, Indonesia. Research Horizon, 2(3), 427-435.
Restuputri, D. P., Masudin, I., Septira, A. P., Govindan, K., & Widayat, W. (2024). The role of knowledge management to improve organizational performance through organizational ambidexterity within the uncertainties. Business Process Management Journal.
Restuputri, D. P., Septira, A. P., & Masudin, I. (2023). The role of creative leadership to improve organizational performance through organizational ambidexterity in creative-based SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
Rizqulloh, A. D. B., Mutmainah, R. E., & Lataruva, E. (2024). Enhancing Corporate Environmental Performance Through Green Human Resource Management. Research Horizon, 4(4), 65-72.
Sengura, J. D., Mu, R., & Zhang, J. (2024). Towards Frugal Innovation Capability in Emerging Markets within the Digitalization Epoch: Exploring the Role of Strategic Orientation and Organizational Ambidexterity. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(3), 2000-2029.
Severgnini, E., Vieira, V. A., & Cardoza Galdamez, E. V. (2018). The indirect effects of performance measurement system and organizational ambidexterity on performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1176-1199.
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of management studies, 46(4), 597-624.
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization science, 16(5), 522-536.
Suprapti, S., & Suparmi, S. (2022). Improving marketing performance through business agility and market orientation in micro, small, and medium enterprises in Semarang City. Arthatama, 6(1), 26-43.
Susilawati, E., Lubis, H., Kesuma, S., Pratama, K., & Khaira, I. (2022). Exploring automated short essay scoring (ases) technology based assessment model: the role of operational management strategies to improve quality at universities. Operational Research In Engineering Sciences: Theory And Applications, 5(3), 244-261.
Trieu, H. D., Nguyen, P. V., Tran, K. T., Vrontis, D., & Ahmed, Z. (2024). Organisational resilience, ambidexterity and performance: the roles of information technology competencies, digital transformation policies and paradoxical leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(7), 1302-1321.
Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity, entrepreneurial orientation, and I-deals: the moderating role of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 145-159.
Tukiran, M., Ghufron, N., Sunaryo, W., Rusli, Z. I., & Dalilah, E. (2022). Public sector management: indispensable facilitating factors in sculpting organisational ambidexterity. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(1), 425-440.
Utomo, P., & Simatupang, B. (2019). The role of alliances formation in organizational ambidexterity and firm competitiveness: An empirical study in Indonesia digital startup firms. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), 1404-1409.
Widijowati, D. (2023). Economic Analysis of Law: Strengthening the Legal Framework for Development. Research Horizon, 3(1), 19-35.
Yunita, T., Sasmoko, S., Bandur, A., & Alamsjah, F. (2024). Contingency perspective to bridge human capital perception to achieve ambidexterity in environmental dynamism. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100806.
Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122114.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
