Legal Examination of Performance Oversight by the Papua People's Representative Council in Accordance with Community Aspirations Through the Mandate of the Special Autonomy Law

Authors

  • Herman Wori Faculty Of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon, Tomohon, North Sulawesi 95441, Indonesia
  • Grenaldo Ginting Faculty Of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon, Tomohon, North Sulawesi 95441, Indonesia
  • Johanis L.S.S. Polii Faculty Of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia Tomohon, Tomohon, North Sulawesi 95441, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.173

Keywords:

Law, Regulation, Special Autonomy, Community Aspirations, Papua

Abstract

The enactment of Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua reflects the political will of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia towards the people of Papua. This decision is based on the consideration that the governance and development implementation in the province of Papua, while integrated with Indonesia, has not fully met the sense of justice, achieved prosperity, enforced the rule of law, and has not fully respected human rights, especially those of the indigenous Papuans. The legal research conducted in this study is normative legal research, focusing on examining norms or regulations related to the research object. Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua represents the ideals and goals of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in building a fair, prosperous, and prosperous Papuan society based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The reality is that in the implementation of special autonomy, there are many deviations from the basic mandate of special autonomy. As a result, the Papuan people still feel left behind in a dilemmatic situation, unable to fully enjoy the benefits of special autonomy. This is because there is no significant improvement in welfare, peace conditions have not arrived, and basic rights are not adequately respected. The Papua Provincial People's Consultative Assembly (DPRP) is a regional representative institution that acts as an organ of the regional government in the province of Papua. The Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the task and authority to absorb, collect, accommodate, and follow up on the aspirations of the people. In accordance with the mandate of the Special Autonomy Law for the province of Papua, the Papua People's Consultative Assembly has the function of conveying the aspirations of the Papuan people regarding development and the expansion of new autonomous regions in the province of Papua to the People's Consultative Assembly (DPR RI).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardinarto, E. S. (2009). Mengenal Adat Istiadat Hukum Adat di Indonesia. LPP UNS dan UNS Press, Surakarta.

Asrinovit, F. (2021). Partai Politik Lokal dalam Otonomi Khusus Papua: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 41/Puu Xvii/2019 tentang Pembentukan Partai Politik Lokal Papua (Bachelor's thesis, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif HIdayatullah Jakarta).

Chairullah, E. (2021). Indonesia’s Failure in Papua: The Role of Elites in Designing, Implementing and Undermining Special Autonomy. Routledge.

Gani, N., & Aituru, Y. P. (2017). Sinergitas Fungsi Kewenangan Antar Lembaga Pemerintahan Daerah Papua Dalam Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Khusus. Legal Pluralism: Journal of Law Science, 7(2), 204-240.

Joesoef, I. E. (2020). The Idea of Customary Law Community Representation in the Regional Representative Council. Unnes Law Journal, 6(1), 119-142.

Lele, G. (2023). Asymmetric decentralization, accommodation and separatist conflict: lessons from Aceh and Papua, Indonesia. Territory, Politics, Governance, 11(5), 972-990.

Putri, K., Pradhani, S. I., & Noor, H. J. (2020). The Existence of Adat Law Community in Public-Private Partnership. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 306-332.

Rahadatul’Aisy, S., Hakim, H. A., Krisnan, J., Hardyanthi, T., & Masithoh, M. Q. D. (2021). Customary criminal law in the Eastern of Indonesia: the special autonomy Province of Papua. Borobudur Law Review, 3(2), 148-160.

Rakia, A. S. R., Suaib, H., & Simanjuntak, K. W. (2021). Continuing the limited authority of the Majelis Rakyat Papua; A missed opportunity. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 34-50.

Riwu Kaho, J. (2005). Prospek Otonomi Daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia (Identifikasi Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah). Penerbit PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Safkaur, T. L. (2022). Institutional Capacity The Assembly Of Papua. Int J Arts Huma Social Studies, 4 (5), 89, 93.

Simandjuntak, R. (2015). Sistem Desentralisasi Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Perspektif Yuridis Konstitusional. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah, 7(1), 57-67.

Solossa, J. P. (2005). Otonomi khusus: mengangkat martabat rakyat Papua di dalam NKRI. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Undang-undang nomor 21 tahun 2001 tentang otonomi khusus bagi provinsi papua.

Widjojo, M. S., Elizabeth, A., Al Rahab, A., Pamungkas, C., & Dewi, R. (2010). Papua road map: Negotiating the past, improving the present, and securing the future. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Wospakrik, D. (2020). The Legislation Function of the Papua People Assembly in Papua Special Autonomy. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 100, 124.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-11

How to Cite

Wori, H., Ginting, G., & Polii, J. (2023). Legal Examination of Performance Oversight by the Papua People’s Representative Council in Accordance with Community Aspirations Through the Mandate of the Special Autonomy Law. Research Horizon, 3(5), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.3.5.2023.173

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.