Norm Localization of Carbon Market Transfer from the European Union to China: Development of the Emissions Trading System

Authors

  • Gravenia Rahma Safira Department of International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.6.3.2026.1142

Keywords:

Carbon Market Norm, Climate Governance, EU ETS, Norm Localization, Policy Learning

Abstract

This article examines how China localized the global carbon market norm, particularly the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), within its domestic climate governance framework. Using a qualitative approach grounded in constructivist International Relations theory and Amitav Acharya’s norm localization framework, the study analyzes how international norms were adapted to fit China’s political and institutional context. The findings show that China did not directly replicate the European cap-and-trade model. Instead, policymakers selectively reconstructed the norm through policy learning, domestic framing, grafting onto existing governance practices, and pruning elements considered incompatible with national priorities. China’s ETS evolved into a hybrid model characterized by intensity-based benchmarking, free allocation, output-based adjustment, sectoral sequencing, and strong state supervision. The regional pilot schemes (2013–2014) and the national ETS launched in 2021 demonstrate this localization process. The study concludes that norm localization increased the domestic legitimacy and institutional compatibility of China’s ETS, although it also created challenges such as weak carbon price signals, limited market liquidity, and uneven implementation. This article contributes to International Relations scholarship by showing that climate norm diffusion involves active translation rather than simple policy transfer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024.

Ahonen, H. M., Kessler, J., Michaelowa, A., Espelage, A., & Hoch, S. (2022). Governance of fragmented compliance and voluntary carbon markets under the Paris Agreement. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4759.

Bayer, P., & Aklin, M. (2020). The European Union emissions trading system reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices. National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8804–8812. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918128117.

Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris climate change agreement: A new hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.0288.

Chang, K., Chen, R., & Chevallier, J. (2018). Market fragmentation, liquidity measures, and improvement perspectives from China’s emissions trading scheme pilots. Energy Economics, 75(10), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.010.

Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708.

Goron, C., & Cassisa, C. (2017). Regulatory institutions and market-based climate policy in China. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00392.

Goulder, L. H., & Schein, A. R. (2013). Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Climate Change Economics, 4(3), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007813500103.

Green, J. F. (2021). Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses. Environmental Research Letters, 16(4), 430-440. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdae9.

Heggelund, G., Stensdal, I., & Duan, M. (2022). China’s carbon market: potential for success?. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4792.

Huang, Y., Fang, K., Liu, G., & Guo, S. (2025). Has the carbon emission trading scheme induced investment leakage in China? Firm-level evidence from China’s stock market. Energy Economics, 141(11), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108091.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Retrieved on October, 25, 2025, from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/.

International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). (2025). Emissions trading worldwide: ICAP status report 2025. Retrieved on October 25, 2025, https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-icap-status-report-2025.

Kauppi, M. V., & Viotti, P. R. (2023). International relations theory. Paris: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068.

Kurniadi, A., Rahman, A. H., & Indriani, F. (2024). Green banking strategy to support business sustainability in banking sector: a literature review. Research Horizon, 4(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.4.4.2024.297.

Lo, A. Y., & Howes, M. (2015). Power and carbon sovereignty in a non-traditional capitalist state: Discourses of carbon trading in China. Global Environmental Politics, 15(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00272.

Mariotti, C. (2016). Theory and practice of emissions trading in the European Union: Some reflections on allowance allocation in light of the DK Recycling case. European Papers, 1(3), 1153–1170. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/94.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Paris: Pearson Education Limited.

Pahle, M., Burtraw, D., Flachsland, C., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., Meckling, J., ... & Zysman, J. (2018). Sequencing to ratchet up climate policy stringency. Nature Climate Change, 8(10), 861–867.

Raufer, R., Coussy, P., Freeman, C., Combs, C., & Prevost, G. (2025). Emissions trading. In Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (pp. 4107-4164). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Stavins, R. N. (2003). Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. In Handbook of Environmental Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 355-435). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Tanveer, U., Ishaq, S., & Hoang, T. G. (2024). Enhancing carbon trading mechanisms through innovative collaboration: Case studies from developing nations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48(12), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144122.

Tvinnereim, E., & Mehling, M. (2018). Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation. Energy Policy, 121(10), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.020.

Van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13.

Višković, V., Chen, Y., & Siddiqui, A. S. (2017). Implications of the EU emissions trading system for the South-East Europe regional electricity market. Energy Economics, 65(9), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.033.

Wang, Z., & Paavola, J. (2023). Emissions trading in China: New political economy dynamics. Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(5), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2046.

Wendt, A. (2025). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. Siyasat Arabiya, 13(72), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X.

Yu, P., Cai, Z., & Sun, Y. (2021). Does the emissions trading system in developing countries accelerate carbon leakage through OFDI? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 101(10), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105397.

Zhang, D., Karplus, V. J., Cassisa, C., & Zhang, X. (2014). Emissions trading in China: Progress and prospects. Energy Policy, 75(9), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.022.

Zhou, K., & Li, Y. (2019). Carbon finance and carbon market in China: Progress and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214(12), 536-549.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Safira, G. R. (2026). Norm Localization of Carbon Market Transfer from the European Union to China: Development of the Emissions Trading System. Research Horizon, 6(3), 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.6.3.2026.1142

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.